HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MS. JYOTI MULIMANI, J
M/S. Pushpagiri Ware House – Appellant
Versus
Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of allotment and agreement. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments from both parties regarding the legality of the revocation. (Para 3 , 4) |
ORDER
Sri.V.B.Shiva Kumar., learned counsel for petitioner and Sri.B.B.Patil., learned counsel for respondents 1 to 3 have appeared in person.
2. The brief facts are these:
The petitioner M/s.Pushpagiri Ware House, Hassan being an entrepreneur, in order to establish a business in Warehousing (Service Activity) approached the Board who had invited applications for the allotment, registration, and conferring right, title, interest, ownership and possession in respect of HASSAN GROWTH CENTRE INDUSTRIAL AREA. The petitioner made an application to the Chief Executive Officer and Executive Member, Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB). The application submitted by the petitioner was scrutinized by the Committee of the Board. The application of the petitioner was accepted and an allotment letter was issued and allotted land by conferring the right, title, interest and ownership of the plot to the petitioner on 06.06.2013. It is said that the Industrial Layout was formed by the Board and identified the Industrial Sites together with t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.