SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 13006

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
RAVI V.HOSMANI
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER – Appellant
Versus
PARMANAND NINGAPPA SARVAGOL – Respondent


Challenging

judgment

and

award

dated

07.09.2011 passed by Fast Track Court-I & Member,

Additional M.A.C.T., Belagavi (for short, ‘tribunal’) in

MVC No.1305/2008, this appeal is filed by insurer.

Brief facts as stated are that in an accident

that occurred on 14.12.2007, claimants/inmates of

Tata sumo bearing Reg.No.KA-26/M-1930 sustained

grievous injuries when it collided with a truck bearing

registration

no.KA-48/675

coming

from

opposite

direction.

Claim

petitions

were

opposed

denying

negligence on part of driver of their respective

vehicles as well as on quantum. Insofar as insurer of

Tata sumo vehicle, it also contended that insurance

policy issued was an ‘Act liability only’ policy and as

claimants were inmates of Tata Sumo, it was not liable

to pay compensation. After examining claimants and

doctor,

who

treated

them and marking exhibits,

Tribunal held accident had occurred due to rash

negligent driving of both offending vehicles to extent

- 4 -

of 50% each. Therefore, insurers were held liable to

pay compensation to extent of 50% of award. It also

assessed

compensation

and

awarded

same

to

claimants.

Shri. G.N.Raichur, learned counsel submitted

that appeal filed by insurer is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top