SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 32481

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
MRS P VASUDHA – Appellant
Versus
MR J SUDHA BABU – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:BALAJI RAGHUNATHAN ,Respondent Advocate:

ORDER

This petition by the impleading applicant in S.C.No.271/2021 is directed against the impugned order dated 16.11.2022 passed by the * XXIII Addl. Small Causes Judge & ACMM (SCCH-25), Bengaluru, whereby the application filed by the petitioner – impleading applicant under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC seeking impleadment was rejected by the Trial Court.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material on record.

3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that in the aforesaid suit filed by respondent No.1 – plaintiff against respondent No.2 – defendant for ejectment and other reliefs in relation to the suit schedule immovable property, application for impleadment filed by the petitioner was rejected by holding as under:

“ ORDERS ON I.A FILED U/O I R.10 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC The counsel for the impleading applicant has filed this application praying to implead the proposed applicant as defendant No.2 in this case.

* Corrected vide Chamber order dated: 30.05.2024.

2. In support of the application the proposed applicant has filed affidavit stating that her tenant who is the defendant in this case had vacated the schedule premises and as such she is an interested party in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top