Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ALOK ARADHE, S VISHWAJITH SHETTY, JJ
C.T. PONNAPPA – Appellant
Versus
SMT. VEENA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed under family courts act aiming for marriage dissolution. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of marital issues and allegations of cruelty established by the appellant. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. respondent's counter allegations and their relevance to the claimed cruelty. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. legal precedents establishing the standards for marital dissolution proceedings. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. final ruling of the court dismissing the appeal. (Para 14) |
JUDGMENT
2. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant and also perused the material available on record.
4. In the said proceedings, the respondent entered appearance and filed her statement of objections denying the allegations made in the petition. To substantiate his case, the appellant himself got examined as PW-1 and exhibited 85 documents as Exs.P-1 to P-85 in support of his case. Whereas, the respondent got herself examined as RW-1 and got marked 7 documents as Exs.R-1 to R-7. The Family Court vide the impugned judgment and decree dated 21.10.2014, dismissed the petition filed by the appellant under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Act. Being aggrieved by the same, the appellant-husband has preferred this appeal.
(i)
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
