SRI. S K PUTTEGOWDA vs THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 1302

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KRISHNA S DIXIT, J
SRI. S K PUTTEGOWDA – Appellant
Versus
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. P MAHESHA
For the Respondents: SRI.R SRINIVASA GOWDA, AGA FOR R1,2 & 4, SRI.K BHEEMAIAH

Table of Content
1. petitioners seek redress for non-consideration of compensation claims. (Para 1)
2. court acknowledges the time lapse but directs timely consideration. (Para 2)

ORDER

2. Learned AGA appearing for the official Respondents and the learned Panel Counsel appearing for the 3rd Respondent – Cauveri Nigama oppose the Writ Petition contending that now years have lapsed and therefore, things cannot be restored even if there is some merit in the claim of the Petitioners. They also submit that several factual aspects are involved and therefore, writ jurisdiction is ill-advised. Having so contended, now they fairly agree to instruct their clients to look into the grievance of the Petitioners in accordance with law, in a time bound way should all the contentions be kept open for urgement. This is appreciable.

All contentions are kept open, costs having been made easy.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document