Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.I. ARUN, UMESH M ADIGA, JJ
PREETAM S/O BAHUBALI NASALAPURE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. transfer procedures were challenged due to lack of justification. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. respondents justify order based on exceptional circumstances. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court highlights the need for written reasons in transfers. (Para 8) |
| 4. court's ruling affirms the legality of the petitioner's initial posting. (Para 9) |
ORDER
Aggrieved by the order dated 20.10.2023 passed in Application No.11057/2023 by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal, Belagavi, the applicant therein has preferred this writ petition.
2. The applicant was working as a Junior Scale KAS Officer and was posted as Chief Administrative Officer of Belagavi Institute of Medical Sciences, Belagavi. He was subsequently promoted as a Senior Scale KAS Officer and by an order dated 26.09.2023, was posted as the Special Land Acquisition Officer (SLAO), National Highways Authorities of India Bagalkote, in the place of respondent No.3 herein. Respondent No.3 is in the cadre of Selection Grade KAS Officer. However, respondent No.3 was not given any posting pursuant to transfer of the petitioner to the said post. Pursuant to the said transfer, the petitioner took charge and reported to duty. However, wit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
