Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M G UMA, J
HEMANTH KUMAR S S/O. SANJAYKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of allegations and context for anticipatory bail. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments for and against the petitioners' bail. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's observations on allegations against each petitioner. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. summary of the court's ruling and conditions for bail. (Para 7) |
ORDER
The petitioners/accused Nos.2 and 3 are before this Court seeking grant of anticipatory bail in Crime No.227/2022 of Thilaknagar Police Station, pending in the Court of 37th Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 120B, 384, 506 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC'), on the basis of the first information lodged by the informant – Sri. Vinod B.
2. Heard Sri. Tigadi Veranna Gadigeppa, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri. Rahul Rai K., learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-State. Perused the materials on record.
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are arrayed as accused Nos.2 and 3 respectively. They are innocent and law abiding citizens. They have not committed any offences as alleged. They have been falsely implicated in the matter without any
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
