HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S G PANDIT,VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL
MRS VIJANTH INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD – Appellant
Versus
THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER – Respondent
Heard the learned counsel Sri.Sadiq N Goodwala for the
petitioners, learned counsel Sri. Shivasai M Patil for
respondent No.1 and Sri.Ram P Ghorpade, learned counsel
for respondent No.2 and perused the writ petition papers
along with statement of objections filed by respondent
No.1/Bank.
2.
The petitioners were before the Debts Recovery
Appellate Tribunal, Chennai (for short, 'DRAT') in AIR
No.274/2022 challenging the order dated 18.07.2022 in SA
No.91/2021 and 173/2022 passed by the Debts Recovery
Tribunal, Bengaluru. IA No.354/2022 was filed by the
petitioners praying to exempt from making any deposit as
contemplated under Section 18(1) of the Securitization and
Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of
- 3 -
Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short, 'SARFAESI Act'). On
the said application, DRAT passed order on 17.04.2023
directing the petitioners herein to deposit a sum of
Rs.1,97,29,181/- within two weeks from the said date i.e. on
or before 1.5.2023, failing which, it observed that appeal
stands dismissed. Challenging the said order, present writ
petition is filed.
3.
Taking note of submission of learned Senior
Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.