- 1 -
NC: 2023:KHC:25575-DB
RFA No. 893 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 893 OF 2023 (SP)
BETWEEN:
1.
MR. M. ANIL KUMAR
S/O LATE T. MURUGAN ACHARI
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
2.
MR. M. GURUPRASAD
S/O LATE T. MURUGAN ACHARI
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
3.
MR. M. KRISHNA
S/O LATE T. MURUGAN ACHARI
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
4.
MR. M. ARUN KUMAR
S/O LATE T. MURUGAN ACHARI
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.23
KHATA NO.112, 4TH CROSS
BANK COLONY
RAJESHWARI NAGAR
LAGGERE
BENGALURU-560 058 …APPELLANTS
(BY SHRI. SIDDHARTH B. MUCHANDI, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by YASHODHA N
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2023:KHC:25575-DB
RFA No. 893 of 2023
AND:
MR. K.J. VINODH
S/O K. JAYAKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.17
SIDDALINGESHWARA LAYOUT
THINDLU, BENGALURU-560 097 …RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI. B.S. ANIL KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF
CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.03.2022 PASSED
IN OS No.5544/17 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL
JUDGE AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR
SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS
RFA,
COMING
ON
FOR
ORDERS,
THIS
DAY,
P.S.DINESH KUMAR, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
This
appeal
under
Section
96
of
Code
of
Civil
Procedure,
1908
is
filed
by
the
defendants
in
O.S.No.5544/2017 against the judgment and decree dated
March 22, 2022 passed by V Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge,
Bengaluru.
Suit is one for specific performance of the Agreement dated
20.06.2014 and it has been decreed.
Heard Shri Siddharth B.Muchandi, learned advocate for the
appellants and Shri B.S.Anil Kumar, learned advocate for the
respondent.
- 3 -
Appellants
No.1
to
4
namely,
Shri
Anil
Kumar,
Shri M.Guruprasad, Shri M.Krishna and Shri M.Arun Kumar are
present
and
identified
by
their
advocate
Shri
Siddharth
B.Muchandi. Respondent-Shri K.J.Vinodh is present and identified
by his advocate Shri B.S.Anil Kumar.
5.
Learned advocates on both sides jointly submit that during
the pendency of the appeal, parties have amicably resolved the
dispute. A compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with
Section 151 of CPC duly signed by both parties and their respective
advocates has been filed. Shri Muchandi has tendered three
demand drafts bearing No.101230, 101229 & 101231 for
Rs.9 Lakhs, Rs.1.82 Lakhs and Rs.3.10 Lakhs respectively to the
respondent and he acknowledges receipt of the same. Parties
submit that they have understood the terms of the compromise.
They pray that this appeal may be disposed of in terms of
settlement recorded in the compromise petition.
6.
The terms of compromise read as follows:
“The appellant and the respondents herein jointly submit as
under:
1. The respondent / plaintiff (purchaser) entered into a
registered
sale
agreement
dated
20/06/2014
with
the
appellants / defendants (sellers) agreeing to purchase the
- 4 -
schedule property for a sale consideration of Rs.26,20,000/-
measuring 1200 sq. ft. consisting of a Ground, First, Second
and half Third-floor building including amenities.
2.
The
respondent/plaintiff
instituted
suit
for
specific
performance and permanent injunction on 22/3/2022 before
the Learned V Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru
(CCH-13) bearing O.S.No.5544/2017, and the Hon'ble Court
had decreed the suit for specific performance on the schedule
property.
3. The appellants/ defendants have filed this appeal challenging
the judgment dated 22/3/2022 and decree dated 31/3/2022
passed in O.S.No.5544/2017.
4.
The litigation in respect of the schedule property has
been pending for the last 5 years. The appellants and the
respondent have amicably settled their dispute involved in the
above Appeal by entering into a mutual agreement on the
following terms and conditions:
a) Appellants and the respondent have agreed that the
respondent will cancel the registered Sale Agreement dated
20/06/2014 bearing document no. SRI-1-01723/2014-15,
registered, in the office of the Sub-Registrar, Srirampuram,
Bangalore, in respect of the Schedule Property and that the
appellants
will
refund
the
advance
amount
of
Rs.26,20,000/- to the respondent in the following manner:
a. Demand draft bearing no. 101230 for Rs.9,00,000/-
dated 06/07/2023 issued by Canara Bank, II of Sc.
Campus Branch, Bangalore favoring respondent,
b. Demand draft bearing no.101231 for Rs. 3,10,000/-
dated 06/07/2023 issued by Canara Bank, II of Sc
Campus Branch, Bangalore favoring respondent,
c. Demand draft no.101229 for Rs.11,82,000/- dated
06/07/2023 issued by Canara Bank, II of Sc Campus
Branch, Bangalore favoring respondent and
- 5 -
d. An amount of Rs.2,28,000/- was paid by way of cash
on 10/07/2023 by the appellants to the respondent.
Receipt of the said 3 demand drafts and the cash is
acknowledged by the respondent as full and final
settlement amount.
b) The respondent undertakes to cancel the above Sale
Agreement dated 20/06/2014, bearing document no. SRI-1-
01723/2014-15, registered in the office of the Sub-
Registrar, Srirampuram, Bangalore, by appearing before the
concerned Sub Registrar Office and cancel the registered
sale agreement by executing a registered cancellation deed
within 15 da
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.