SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 9322

- 1 -

NC: 2023:KHC-K:7783-DB

WA No. 200105 of 2023

C/W WA No. 200106 of 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

KALABURAGI BENCH

DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ

AND

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

WRIT APPEAL NO. 200105 OF 2023 (LB-ELE)

C/W

WRIT APPEAL NO. 200106 OF 2023 (LB-ELE)

IN W.A.NO.200105/2023

BETWEEN:

1.

AMBIKA W/O GOVIND HULMANI,

AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,

OCC: MEMBER SUNTANOOR GRAM PANCHAYAT,

R/O: NEAR PANCHAYATI SUNTANOOR VILLAGE,

TQ: ALAND, DIST: KALABURAGI-585311.

2.

ASHADEVI W/O ARJUN WAGGAN,

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,

OCC: MEMBER SUNTANOOR GRAM PANCHAYAT,

R/O: BHEEM NAGAR, SUNTANOOR VILLAGE,

TQ: ALAND, DIST: KALABURAGI-585311.

…APPELLANTS

(BY SRI. RAVI B. PATIL, ADVOCATE)

Digitally signed by

KHAJAAMEEN L

MALAGHAN

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

- 2 -

NC: 2023:KHC-K:7783-DB

WA No. 200105 of 2023

C/W WA No. 200106 of 2023

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

DEPT. OF PANCHAYAT RAJ

VIDHANA SOUDHA,

BENGALURU-560 001.

BY ITS SECRETARY

2.

THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSIONER,

CUNNINGHAM ROAD,

BENGALURU-560001.

3.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSSIONER,

KALABURAGI DISTRICT,

KALABURAGI-585401.

4.

THE GRAM PANCHAYAT,

SUNTANOOR, TQ: ALAND,

DIST: KALABURAGI-585401.

REPRESENTED BY PDO.

5.

THE DESIGNATED OFFICER,

GRAM PANCHAYAT SUNTANOOR,

BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER,

ALAND, DIST: KALABURAGI-585 401.

6.

SMT. NAGAMMA W/O BHEEMSHA DANNUR,

AGED ABOAUT 54 YEARS,

OCC: MEMBER OF GRAM PANCHAYAT,

SUNTANOOR,

R/O: SUNTANOOR VILLAGE,

DIST: KALABURAGI-585401.

7.

SMT. REKHA W/O RAVINRA,

AGED ABOAUT 35 YEARS,

OCC: MEMBER OF GRM PANCHAYAT,

SUNTANOOR,

R/O: SUNANOOR VILLAGE,

DIST: KALABURAGI-585401.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. VEERANAGOUDA MALIPATIL, HCGP FOR R1, R3 & R5

SRI. P.S. MALIPATIL, ADV. FOR R2;

SRI. VENKATESH C. MALLABADI, ADV. FOR R4;

SMT. RATNA N. SHIVAYOGIMATH AND

SRI. SANTOSH H. PATIL, ADV'S FOR R6 & R7)

- 3 -

NC: 2023:KHC-K:7783-DB

WA No. 200105 of 2023

C/W WA No. 200106 of 2023

THIS APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF KARNATAKA HIGH

COURT ACT, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN WRIT

PETITION NO. 202285/2023 ON THE FILE OF LEARNED SINGLE

JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER

IMPUGNED DATED 08.08.2023, PASSED IN WRIT PETITION NO.

202285/2023 AND CONSEQUENTIALLY TO DISMISS THE WRIT

PETITION IN ENTIRETY, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. ISSUE

A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.5 TO

DECLARE THE APPELLANTS AS DULY ELECTED IN VIEW OF

ONLY NOMINATION RECEIVED WITHIN SPECIFIED TIME ON

02.08.2023 AS PER THE CALENDAR OF EVENTS WITHOUT

INSISTING FOR THE QUORUM IN THE MEETING.

IN W.A.NO.200106/2023

BETWEEN:

1.

SMT. MANGALABAI

W/O TUKARAM KELINKERI,

AGE: 40 YEARS,

OCC: GRAM PANCHAYAT MEMBER BODHAN,

R/O: BODHAN VILLAGE,

TQ: ALAND, DIST: KALABURAGI.

2.

NAGAMMA W/O SHIVAPUTRAPPA,

AGE: 40 YEARS,

OCC: GRAM PANCHAYAT MEMBER BODHAN,

R/O: BODHAN VILLAGE,

TQ: ALAND, DIST: KALABURAGI.

…APPELLANTS

(BY SRI. AMEETH KUMAR DESHPANDE ADV. FOR

SRI. MAHADEV S. PATIL , ADVOCATES)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT RAJ

VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALURU-560 052,

REPT. BY SECRETARY

2.

THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSIONER,

CUNNINGHAM ROAD,

BANGALORE-01.

- 4 -

NC: 2023:KHC-K:7783-DB

WA No. 200105 of 2023

C/W WA No. 200106 of 2023

3.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSSIONER,

KALABURAGI, DIST: KALABURAGI-585101.

4.

THE GRAM PANCHAYAT,

BODHAN, TQ: ALAND,

DIST: KALABURAGI-585401.

REPRESENTED BY PDO.

5.

THE DESIGNATED OFFICER,

GRAM PANCHAYAT BODHAN,

CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER,

ALAND, DIST: KALABURAGI.

6.

SMT. CHANDRAKALA

W/O SANTOSHA KAMBHALE,

AGE: 39 YEARS,

OCC: MEMBER OF GRAM PANCHAYAT BODHAN,

TQ: ALAND, DIST: KALABURAGI-585401.

7.

PRAKASH S/O CHANDRASHA NARONI,

AGE: 47 YEARS,

OCC: MEMBER OF GRAM PANCHAYAT BODHAN,

TQ: ALAND, DIST: KALABURAGI-585401.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. VEERANAGOUDA MALIPATIL, HCGP FOR R1, R3 & R5

SRI. P. S. MALIPATIL, ADV. FOR R2;

SRI. VENKATESH C. MALLABADI, ADV. FOR R4;

SMT. HEMA L. K., ADV FOR R6 & R7)

THIS APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF KARNATAKA HIGH

COURT ACT, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS WRIT APPEAL BE SET-

ASIDE

THE

IMPUGNED

PASSED

IN

WP.

NO.

202284/2023(LB-ELE) DATED 08.08.2023 IN THE INTEREST OF

JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION AND

HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED ON 03.08.2023,

COMING

ON

FOR

PRONOUNCEMENT

THIS

DAY,

RAJESH RAI K. J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

- 5 -

JUDGMENT

The grievance of the appellants in these two appeals

is in respect of common issue pertaining to election of

Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of two village panchayats,

challenged under different writ petitions and both writ

petitions allowed by the learned Single Judge vide order

dated 08.08.2023, against the said orders, these two writ

appeals are filed. Hence, both these appeals are taken up

for disposal in this common order.

The

factual

matrix

of

the

case

in

W.A.No.200105/2023 are that the appellants are elected

members of Gram Panchayat Suntanoor village. In the

said Gram Panchayat, the post of Adhyaksha and

Upadhyaksha became vacant due to completion of first

tenure, therefore the calendar of event for holding election

of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha was issued on 02.08.2023

by scheduling the meeting for election on 02.08.2023 at

1.10 p.m. It is clarified that the nominations to the post

of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha were to be filed before

- 6 -

11.00 A.M. on 02.08.2023. The appellants being

aspirants, filed their nominations within specified time on

02.08.2023, which were duly accepted after due scrutiny

at 1.00 p.m. However, out of 13 Gram Panchayat

Members, only 06 members were present in the meeting

and there were no other nominations received by the 5th

respondent. Hence, the 5th respondent adjourned the

meeting to 09.08.2023 for lack of quorum.

The respondent Nos.6 and 7 being aware of the

proceedings dated 02.08.2023, having failed to file any

nomination, have approached the learned Single Judge in

W.P.No.202285/2023 with a specific pleading that they

being the aspirants to contest for the post of Adhyaksha

and Upadhyaksha, had approached the office of Panchayat

with their respective nominations, however the 5th

respondent has not permitted them to file nomination,

therefore, they returned without filing their nominations.

The learned Single Judge after considering the facts and

circumstances of the case, allowed the writ petition and

- 7 -

directed the 5th respondent to issue fresh calendar of

events permitting the 6th and 7th respondents to file

nomination. The said order of the learned Single Judge is

challenged in the above appeal.

In W.A.No.200106/2023, the facts are that, the

appellants are elected members of Gram Panchayat

Bodhan village, Tq: Aland. In the said Gram Panchayat,

the post of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha became vacant

due to completion of first tenure, therefore the calendar of

event for holding election of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha

was issued on 02.08.2023 by scheduling the meeting for

election on 02.08.2023 at 1.10 p.m. It is clarified that the

nominations to the post of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha

were to be filed before 12.00 noon on 02.08.2023. The

appellants being the aspirants, filed their nomination

within specified time on 02.08.2023, which were duly

accepted after due scrutiny at 2.10 p.m. However,

election was not conducted on account of short of quorum

and accordingly, adjourned to 09.08.2023.

- 8 -

The respondent No.6 and 7 being aware of the

proceedings dated 02.08.2023, having failed to file any

nomination, have approached the learned Single Judge in

W.P.No.202284/2023 with a specific pleading that they

being the aspirants to contest for the post of Adhyaksha

and Upadhyaksha, had approached the office of Panchayat

with their respective nominations, however the 5th

respondent has not permitted them to file nomination on

the ground that there is no quorum, therefore the meeting

will be adjourned to 09.08.2023, therefore, they returned

without filing their nominations. The learned Single Judge

after considering the facts and circumstances of the case,

allowed the writ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top