SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 6572

- 1 -

NC: 2023:KHC:30123

CP No. 250 of 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2023

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT

CIVIL PETITION NO. 250 OF 2023

BETWEEN:

1.

BHAGYALASKHMI S M @ PREETHI

AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS

W/O LOKES BABU

D/O MANJUNATH

R/O BRUNDAVANA

2ND STAGE, MAIN ROAD

MALLESHWARA NAGARA

SHIVAMOGGA-577201.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI.P.N.HARISH., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

LOKESH BABU

AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS

S/O HANUAMAIAH

R/AT No.493, 13TH A CROSS

28TH MAIN, J.P.NAGAR 1ST PHASE

BENGALURU SOUTH, BENGALURU-560 078.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI.AMIT A DESHPANDE., ADVOCATE)

THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER HAS FILED THE ABOVE

CIVIL PETITION UNDER SECTION 24 OF THE CPC, PRAYING THAT

THIS HON’BLE COURT BE PLEASED TO A) TRANSFER THE CASE

BEARING NUMBER M.C.NO.5964/2022 FROM THE FILE OF LEARNED

III ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU TO

THE

FILE

OF

LEARNED

PRINCIPAL

JUDGE,

FAMILY

COURT,

SHIVAMOGGA BY ALLOWING THIS PETITION WITH COSTS IN THE

ENDS OF JUSTICE.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE

COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

Digitally

signed by

PRAMILA G V

Location:

HIGH COURT

OF

KARNATAKA

- 2 -

NC: 2023:KHC:30123

CP No. 250 of 2023

The petitioner/wife is before this Court under Section

24 of CPC with a prayer to transfer the proceedings in

M.C.No.5964/2022 on the file of the III Additional Principal

Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru to the Principal Judge,

Family Court at Shivamogga.

2.

Heard the learned counsel Sri.P.N.Harish for

petitioner/wife and learned counsel Sri.Amit A. Deshpande

for respondent. Perused the Civil Petition papers.

3.

It is submitted that marriage of the petitioner

and respondent was solemnized on 08.05.2014 and from

the marriage, they have two minor children aged 7 and 5

years respectively. Learned counsel for the petitioner

would submit that petitioner is residing at Shivamogga

with her parents along with two minor children. Learned

counsel would submit that respondent has instituted

proceedings in M.C.No.5964/2022 under Section 13(1)(ia)

of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short, ‘1955 Act’)

seeking

dissolution

of

marriage

at

Family

Court,

- 3 -

Bengaluru. Learned counsel would submit that it would be

difficult for petitioner to travel from Shivamogga to

Bengaluru to attend the proceedings along with her minor

children.

Learned

counsel

would

also

submit

that

Crl.Misc.No.128/2023 and M.C.No.91/2023 filed under

Section 9 of the 1955 Act by petitioner/wife are pending

before the Family Court at Shivamogga. Therefore, it is

prayed that M.C.No.5964/2022 pending on the Family

Court at Bengaluru be transferred to the Family Court at

Shivamogga.

4.

Per

contra,

learned

counsel

Sri.Amit

A.

Deshpande for respondent/husband would submit that

petitioner/wife is working in a company situated at

Bengaluru, but the petitioner has suppressed the said fact.

Further, learned counsel would submit that petitioner has

to look after his aged parents at Bengaluru. It is also

stated that uncle of the petitioner/wife attempted to

manhandle respondent/husband at Bengaluru. As there is

likelihood of manhandling by uncle of the petitioner/wife at

- 4 -

Shivamogga, learned counsel prays that other than

Shivamogga, the proceedings be transferred to any other

Court. Thus, he prays for appropriate order.

5.

Having heard the learned counsel appearing for

the parties and on perusal of the civil petition papers, I am

of the view that petitioner/wife would be entitled for the

relief sought in the petition.

6.

Admittedly,

respondent/husband

filed

M.C.No.5964/2022 on the file of the III Additional Principal

Judge, Family Court at Benglauru and the cause title of the

said

petition

would

indicate

the

address

of

the

petitioner/wife

at

Shivamogga.

Therefore,

the

respondent/husband cannot dispute that petitioner/wife is

residing at Shivamogga along with her parents. The

petitioner has to look after two minor children aged 7 and

5 years respectively. Normally, while considering petition

filed under Section 24 of CPC for transfer, more

particularly, in matrimonial cases, the Court shall have to

take note of the inconvenience or hardship that would be

- 5 -

caused to the wife along with social and financial status of

the parties. In the instant case, petitioner is residing at

Shivamogga along with her parents and minor children. It

would be difficult for the petitioner/wife to travel from

Shivamogga to Bengaluru along with her minor children.

7.

Learned counsel for the respondent contends

that the respondent/husband has to look after his aged

parents and he has threat if he enters Shivamogga from

uncle of the petitioner/wife. Admittedly, the incident of

attempting to manhandle has taken place at Bengaluru.

Moreover, the ground that respondent/husband has to

look after his aged parents is not a ground to deny the

transfer of proceedings. Further, learned counsel for

respondent/husband would submit that uncle of the

petitioner/wife

is

from

Shivamogga.

Therefore,

he

apprehends attack from uncle of the petitioner/wife. It is

only an apprehension of the respondent/husband. Such

apprehension of respondent/husband cannot be a reason

to deny relief to the petitioner/wife.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top