PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SRI. PRABHURAJ HIREMATH – Appellant
Versus
SRI. PALANI GURU. S – Respondent
This appeal is filed by the appellant/complainant
under Section 378(4)
of
Cr.P.C.
challenging
the
judgment of acquittal passed by XIII Additional Chief
Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, in CC.No.2055/2017,
dated 06.06.2019.
2.
He has also filed I.A.No.1/2019 seeking leave of
the Court under Section 378(4) of Cr.P.C. for instituting
this appeal.
3.
For the sake of convenience, the parties herein
are referred with the original ranks occupied by them
before the trial Court.
4.
The brief factual matrix leading to the case are
that the complainant has lodged a complaint against
accused for the offence punishable under Section 138 of
- 3 -
the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short ‘N.I. Act’)
in respect of cheque bounce. It is asserted that the
accused has availed a loan of Rs.9,50,000/- from the
complainant and in discharge of the said debt, cheque
came to be issued which was dishonoured. Hence, he filed
a complaint.
5.
The complainant was examined as PW1 and his
wife was examined as PW2 and one witness was examined
as PW3. He has placed reliance on 15 documents marked
at Ex.P1 to Ex.P15. Then the statement under Section 313
Cr.P.C. was recorded and accused denied the same
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.