SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 1642

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
MR SHAMSUDHEEN K V – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:PRAVEEN KUMAR K N ,Respondent Advocate:

ORDER

This petition is directed against the impugned order dated

10.04.2024 passed by the Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal – II (for short ‘the DRT’), Bangalore, whereby the objections filed by the petitioners were over-ruled by the 1st respondent – Recovery officer.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the material on record.

3. Though several contentions have been urged by the petitioners in support of their claim in the present petition, having regard to the availability of an efficacious alternative remedy by way of an appeal to be filed by the petitioners against the impugned order before the DRT as contemplated under Section 30 of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 (for short ‘ the said Act of 1993’), without expressing any opinion on the merits / demerits of the rival contentions, I deem it just and appropriate to dispose of this petition reserving liberty in favour of the petitioners to file an appeal under Section 30 of the said Act of 1993. If such an appeal is preferred within a period of six weeks from today, the petitioners would be entitled to the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act.

4. Subject to the aforesaid directions a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top