HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.G.PANDIT
SRI. LAKSHMAN – Appellant
Versus
THE BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE – Respondent
Heard Sri Ravishankar S. learned counsel for the
petitioner and Sri. Neglur Aravind, learned counsel for the
respondents. Perused the writ petition papers.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that
petitioner is before this Court challenging the impugned
endorsement
(Annexure-E)
bearing
No.Sani(Sa)/P.R/
201/2022-23 dated 15.09.2022, wherein the respondent-
BBMP has informed the petitioner that since death has
taken place outside the jurisdiction of BBMP, it would not
be in a position to issue death certificate in respect of one
Late Kamalamma, wife of the petitioner. The petitioner
has also made a prayer to direct the 2nd respondent to
issue Non-Availability Certificate in Form No.10 referring to
the date of death of Kamalamma as 30.05.2012. Learned
- 3 -
counsel for the petitioner would submit that for the
present he would not press the prayer for quashing of
endorsement (Annexure-E) dated 15.09.2022. However,
he insists for a direction as sought at prayer 2. Learned
counsel for the petitioner would submit that Non
Availability
Certificate
issued
at
Annexure-D
dated
22.02.2022 indicates that the date of death of the wife of
the petitioner as 01.06.2012, whe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.