HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY,C M JOSHI
VEERANAGOUDA S/O BASANAGOUDA HIREGOUDRA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
Both these appeals have arisen out of a common
judgment dated 27.11.2019 passed by the First Additional
District and Sessions Judge, at Haveri (hereinafter for
brevity referred to as ‘the Sessions Judge’s Court’) in S.C.
No.35/2012 and S.C. No.38/2012.
Learned counsels from both side are physically
present. Learned counsels from both side including the
learned
Additional
State
Public
Prosecutor
for
the
respondent-State make a joint submission that admittedly,
both the sessions cases have arisen from out of a case and
a counter-case, though both the cases were shown to
have been tried separately, however, it appears that the
- 7 -
learned Sessions Judge has heard the arguments together
and has passed the common judgment which is not in
accordance with the judgment of Full Bench of this Court
reported in State of Karnataka, by Circle Inspector of
Police –vs- Hosakeri Ningappa and another, reported in
ILR 2012 KAR 509. With this, both side submit that the
impugned judgment deserves to be set aside and the
matter requires to be remanded to the Sessions Judge’s
Court with a direction to hear the final arguments afresh
and dispose of both the cases on the line of guidelines in
the abov
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.