Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned HCGP appearing for the respondent/State.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would vehemently contend that even though without any application for freezing of account of Fixed Deposit made by the petitioner, the same was freezed by the bank. The Trial Court passed an order for defreezing of particular account. Accordingly, an application dated 28.11.2023 was filed seeking defreezing of Fixed Deposits account and the bank also made an endorsement on the said application. But the Trial Court committed an error in not passing an order of defreezing of the Fixed Deposit accounts and in paragraph 9 an observation is made that the petitioner has not mentioned the Fixed Deposit numbers and the amount standing in the above said account, hence, not made out the ground to allow the application and rejected the said application.

3. The counsel for the petitioner submits that at page No.50 to the said petition, the details of account are furnished. Hence, the petitioner is permitted to make a fresh application before the Trial Court by furnishing the details of the Fixed Deposit account number as well as