SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 37526

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
R. NATARAJ
SRI R J DAYANANDA – Appellant
Versus
SMT NARASAMMA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:SRINIVASA ,Respondent Advocate:

ORAL ORDER

The defendant in O.S. No.216/2024 on the file of X Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru (henceforth referred to as ‘the Commercial Court’) has filed this petition challenging an order dated 20.09.2024 by which an application (I.A No.4) under Order VII Rule 10 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘CPC’) was rejected.

2. The parties shall henceforth be referred to as they were arrayed before the Trial Court. The petitioner herein was the defendant while the respondents herein were the plaintiffs before the Commercial Court.

3. The suit in Commercial O.S No.216/2024 was filed for the following reliefs:

“b. Decree the suit of the plaintiffs.

c. Joint Development Agreement dated 25.04.2022, registered in the office of the sub registrar office Jayanagar vide document No.JAY-1-00612-2022- 23 Stored in CD No.JAYD1217 Book-1 executed between the plaintiffs and defendant be declared as cancelled.

d. The General Power of Attorney dated

25.04.2022, registered in the office of the sub registrar office Jayanagar vide document No.JAY- 4-00114-2022-23 Stored in CD No.JAYD1217 Book-4 executed between the plaintiffs and de

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top