SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 36794

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J
MALLAMMA – Appellant
Versus
VISHWANATH – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:AJAY KUMAR ASHOK KUMAR ,Respondent Advocate:

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR)

This petition by the defendant in O.S.No.252/2019 on the file of II Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Sindhanur, is directed against the impugned order dated 01.10.2024, whereby the application I.A.8 filed by the respondent – plaintiff under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC for appointment of a court commissioner was allowed by the trial court.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material on record.

3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that the respondent – plaintiff instituted the aforesaid suit against the petitioner – defendant for declaration, recovery of possession and (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) other reliefs in relation to suit schedule immovable property. The said suit having been contested by the petitioner – defendant, the respondent – plaintiff field an application I.A.No.8 invoking Order 26 Rule 9 CPC and sought for appointment of court commissioner to conduct local inspection of the suit schedule property. The said application having been opposed by the petitioner, the trial court proceeded to pass the impugned order allowing the application by holding as under:-

ORDER ON LA.NO.VIII

The plaintiff has fi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top