Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI, J
SRI RUDRA DEVARU – Appellant
Versus
SRI V MOHAN KUMAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the suit giving rise to this (Para 3) |
| 2. counsel therefore, submits that (Para 4) |
| 3. a perusal of the judgment (Para 5) |
| 4. resultantly, the regular second (Para 6) |
ORAL ORDER
Sri.D.R.Rajashekharappa., counsel for the appellant and Sri.N.Subba Shastry., counsel for the respondents have appeared in person.
2. Heard the arguments and perused the appeal papers with care.
3. The suit giving rise to this appeal was brought by the plaintiff against V.Mohan Kumar - the sole defendant seeking the relief of permanent injunction in O.S.No.11/2008 on the file of Prl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Ramanagara alleging that the sole defendant is interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property. On the trial of the action, the Trial Court vide Judgment dated 15.01.2013 dismissed the suit. The plaintiff assailed the Judgment of the Trial Court before the First Appellate Court. The First Appellate Court vide Judgment dated 16.07.2018 dismissed the appeal. Hence, the plaintiff has filed the captioned appeal under Section 100 of CPC.
4. Counsel Sri.D.R.Rajashekharappa., in presenting his arguments submits that the First Appellate Court disposed of the appeal on 1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
