SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 7393

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
SHRI. SHAMSUNDAR VASUDEV KAMAT, – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA, – Respondent


This revision petition is filed under section 397 and 401

of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the

judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by

JMFC, II Court, Belagavi, in C.C.No.887/2004 and confirmed

in Crl.A.No.77/2010, by the II Addl. Sessions Judge,

Belagavi, pertaining to the offences punishable under section

3(1), 4(1) and 12(1)(A) of the Karnataka Motor Vehicle

Taxation Act, 1957.

2.

The brief factual matrix leading to the case are

that the accused-revision petitioner was registered owner of

the vehicle bearing registration No.KA-22/A-3444 and he has

failed to pay tax for a period from 01.02.2002 to 31.08.2004

in spite of issuance of number of demand notices. Hence it is

alleged that he was required to pay tax of Rs.88,900/- under

Sections 3(1) and 4(1) of the Karnataka Motor Vehicle

Taxation Act and thereby he was prosecuted.

- 3 -

3.

After submission of the charge sheet, summons

have been issued to the accused and he has appeared and

was enlarged on bail. He was furnished with the prosecution

papers. The accusation was read over and explained to him

and he pleaded not guilty. Thereafter the complainant RTO

was examined as PW.1 and exhibits P.1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top