SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 8041

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
SRI.RAMDAS KELU NAIK, – Appellant
Versus
SRI.ASHOK GANAPATI SHETTY, – Respondent


This appeal is filed by the appellant-complainant

under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

challenging the judgment of acquittal dated 31.03.2016,

passed

by

the

JMFC,

2nd

Court,

Karwar,

in

C.C.No.419/2010 by acquitting the accused-respondent

herein for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable

Instruments Act, 1881.

2.

The brief factual matrix leading to the case are

that, the complainant is the permanent resident of Karwar

and he is doing real estate business. The respondent-

accused is also a businessman doing share marketing of

commodity and equity share business.

3.

It is further asserted that both the accused and

the complainant came in contact in respect of their

business and the accused asked the complainant to join

his business with an assurance to give Rs.15,000/- per

month, in case he invests Rs.1,50,000/- in the business.

Accordingly, the complainant invested Rs.1,50,000/- by

- 3 -

paying the amount to accused through cheque. But as per

the agreement, the accused did not pay the monthly profit

of Rs.15,000/- as well as the investment amount. The

complainant demanded for repayment of his amount. It is

alleged that on 14.12.2019 the complainant has issue

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top