HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
SRI.RAMDAS KELU NAIK, – Appellant
Versus
SRI.ASHOK GANAPATI SHETTY, – Respondent
This appeal is filed by the appellant-complainant
under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure,
challenging the judgment of acquittal dated 31.03.2016,
passed
by
the
JMFC,
2nd
Court,
Karwar,
in
C.C.No.419/2010 by acquitting the accused-respondent
herein for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable
Instruments Act, 1881.
2.
The brief factual matrix leading to the case are
that, the complainant is the permanent resident of Karwar
and he is doing real estate business. The respondent-
accused is also a businessman doing share marketing of
commodity and equity share business.
3.
It is further asserted that both the accused and
the complainant came in contact in respect of their
business and the accused asked the complainant to join
his business with an assurance to give Rs.15,000/- per
month, in case he invests Rs.1,50,000/- in the business.
Accordingly, the complainant invested Rs.1,50,000/- by
- 3 -
paying the amount to accused through cheque. But as per
the agreement, the accused did not pay the monthly profit
of Rs.15,000/- as well as the investment amount. The
complainant demanded for repayment of his amount. It is
alleged that on 14.12.2019 the complainant has issue
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.