SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 33591

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
HARSHA N – Appellant
Versus
THE KARNATAKA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION – Respondent


ORDER

Heard the learned Senior counsel Sri Aditya Sondhi for the petitioners in W.P.No.10575/2021 and the learned Senior counsel Sri Sandesh Chouta for the petitioners in W.P. No.17163/2021 and the learned Senior counsel Sri Reuben Jacob for respondent No.1, learned AAG Sri Dhyan Chinnappa along with Smt. Shilpa S Gogi, learned HCGP for respondent No.2 and Sri Udaya Holla, learned senior counsel for respondent Nos.4 to 58 and Smt. Aruna P Chavan, learned counsel for respondent No.59.

2. As both writ petitions are canvassed on common grounds of fact and law, both petitions are taken up for consideration by this common order.

3. The petitioners are before this Court being aggrieved by the order passed by the KSAT, Bengaluru whereby the Hon’ble Tribunal was pleased to reject the applications preferred by the petitioners (who were the applicants) by its order dated 12.05.2021.

4. The bare facts necessary to dispose off the litigation, are that the first respondent issued a notification bearing No.PS C 1 RTB/2/2017 dated 23.03.2018, thereby inviting applications from eligible candidates for the post of Drug Inspector in the third respondent department. The notification came to be issued und

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top