SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 33477

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SRI MOHAMMED AYAZ PASHA – Appellant
Versus
THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER – Respondent


ORDER

Learned counsel Sri Sunil H.R. for the petitioner is present before the court physically and represents Sri R.B.Prakash who is on record. Similarly, learned counsel Raghavendra A.Kulkarni for respondent is present before the Court.

2. In this writ petition the petitioner is challenging the impugned order dated 30.06.2022 passed by the Karnataka Land grabbing Prohibition Special Court at Bengaluru in LGC(G) No.361/2019 vide Annexure-A and for such other reliefs. In the operative portion of the order passed indicating that “acting under Section 255(2) of Cr.P.C. the accused is hereby convicted for the offence punishable under Section 4(3) of the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 and sentenced to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- to the complainant. Further the accused was directed to handover the possession of the schedule property to the complainant within 60 days failing which, the complainant is at liberty to take possession of the schedule property at the cost of the accused after appeal period. The said complaint was initiated by the Assistant Executive Engineer, Karnataka Housing Board, Bengaluru Urban District P

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top