SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 33905

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SRI B. ASHOK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned AGA for respondent Nos.1 to 3.

2. The petitioner was discharging duties as a Village Accountant in Telagi Circle, Harapanahalli Taluk and thereafter by order dated 24.09.2018, came to be transferred to Ramagondanahalli Circle, Davanagere and while discharging his duties in the said post, Anti Corruption Bureau conducted a raid on respondent No.4 and respondent No.4 was caught red handed and thereafter, she was transferred to the post of the petitioner and the petitioner to the post held by her. This came to be questioned by the petitioner. The said application was resisted by the learned Government Advocate and the learned counsel for respondent No.4. In fact, it has been alleged that the petitioner is also facing charges for having demanded and accepted illegal gratification from a widow under the National Family Financial Assistant Scheme and a case has been registered and is pending before the Special Court for Lokayuktha i.e., the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Davanagere. Taking note of this, the Tribunal has placed reliance on the Government Guidelines of 2013 whereby, it has been categorically stated t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top