SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 33987

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SRI E KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
SMT MUNILAKSHMAMMA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

This appeal is filed by the appellant/claimant challenging the judgment and award dated 21.03.2011 passed in MVC.No.9363/2007 by the learned Principal MACT and Chief Judge, Court of Small Causes, Bengaluru, seeking for enhancement of compensation.

2. Brief facts of the case are that, on 14.10.2006 at about 11.30 p.m., the claimant was standing near Honnenahalli Gate on Bengaluru-Doddaballapur road. At that time, friends of the claimant reached near Honnenahally Gate and stopped their motorcycle in order to talk to the claimant and when they were talking to each other, a Tempo Traveler bearing Reg.No.KA-04-B-5289 came in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the claimant. Due to which, the claimant sustained grievous injuries.

3. Heard the arguments from both sides and perused the records.

4. The Tribunal has awarded the compensation under various heads as follows:

Sl. No. Head of compensation Amount/Rs.
1 Injury, Pain and suffering 1,.00,000-00
2 Medical expenditure 3,05,545-00
3 Conveyance Charges 2,000-00
4 Attendant Charges 12,000-00
5 Loss of earning during the period of treatment 24,000-00
6 Loss of future earnings on account of disability 3,19,6

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top