SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 36221

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
M/S KAMALALAYA HIISOFT (P) LTD – Appellant
Versus
M/S SREE VENKATESWARA DEVELOPERS – Respondent


ORDER

The writ petitioners are defendants 1 to 3 in O.S.No.662/2023, on the file of XXXIX Additional City Civil Judge (CCH-40), Bengaluru. The respondent is the plaintiff and it, being a partnership firm, has claimed damages of Rs. 100,00,00,000/- (Rupees One hundred Crores) with interest at the rate of 12% per annum for slanderous and libelous defamatory statements made by the petitioners. The respondent also filed an application under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC requesting the court to pass an order attaching the petitioners’ immovable property and bank account before judgment. The suit was filed on 27.01.2023, and on the same day the suit was posted before the court for consideration of I.A.No.1 filed under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC. The petitioners had entered caveat, and in the presence of counsel for respondent and the petitioners, the trial court heard on I.A.1 and posted the case to 30.01.2023 for orders on the application. On 28.01.2023, the petitioners filed this writ petition seeking to quash the order dated 27.01.2023 produced at Annexure A. Since on 30.01.2023, the trial court passed an order directing the petitioners to show cause as to why they should not furnish securit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top