SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 36874

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
B K PURUSHOTHAMA – Appellant
Versus
THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR – Respondent


ORDER

The present Application has been filed seeking for appropriate directions to the Official Liquidator to rectify the sale deed and re-fix the boundaries as per the plan approved by the Davanagere-Harihara Urban Development Authority.

2. It is the case of the applicant that the sale deed has been executed in favour of the applicant in terms of the document at Annexure ‘C’ dated 31.08.2017. However, at the time of obtaining khata, there were certain discrepancies in the boundaries that were noticed and accordingly, the present application has been filed seeking for execution of a rectification deed and to mention the boundaries of the property as is made out from the approved layout plan extract of which is produced at Annexure ‘E’.

3. Learned counsel for the Official Liquidator submits that sale deed was executed on the basis of records and the Official Liquidator would leave it to the Court to pass appropriate orders as long as the Official Liquidator is indemnified from any future claims by virtue of rectified sale deed.

4. Taking note of submissions of both sides, the contention of the applicant that sale deed may have to be executed with boundaries as is made out in the layout

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top