SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 40257

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SMT GOWRAMMA – Appellant
Versus
SRI KRISHNAPPA – Respondent


ORDER

The petitioners have filed this petition seeking to quash the award dated 30.01.2017 passed in Lok Adalath in OS No.688 of 2017 on the file of the learned LXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru and the order dated 04.10.2017 passed in Execution Case No.424 of 2017 on the file of the learned LXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, granting police protection for the respondents to construct the compound wall. 2. Heard Sri. N.Praveen Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners. Learned counsel for the respondents is absent and not addressed his arguments till today. Hence, his arguments is taken as Nil. Perused the materials on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that respondent No.1 being the plaintiff filed the suit OS No.688 of 2017 on 24.01.2017 seeking perpetual injunction against the defendant who is respondent No.2 herein. Within 5 days, both of them entered into compromise to settle the dispute in the Lok Adalath held on 30.01.2017. Accordingly, the award was passed. Based on the award, Execution Case No.424 of 2017 came to be filed on 13.02.2017. The decree holder sought for police protection for the purpose of cons

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top