Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA, J
MR. HEMACHANDRA M.KUPPALLI – Appellant
Versus
M/S R.B.GREEN FIELD AGRO INFRA PVT LTD. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of cheque issuance and dishonor. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. execution case initiation and respondent evasion. (Para 4 , 9) |
| 3. arguments regarding settlement and its implications. (Para 5 , 7 , 10) |
| 4. guidelines for compounding offences under section 138. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. fraudulent settlement impacts legal outcomes. (Para 15) |
| 6. order restoration of appeal proceedings. (Para 16) |
ORDER
The petitioner is before this Court seeking a direction by issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus for expeditious disposal of Execution Case No.640 of 2017 pending before the City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru and has also sought further slew of prayers including restoration of the order of conviction and sentence dated 26-08-2015 passed against the respondent No.1/accused No.2 in C.C.No.15698 of 2014 by the XXI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru.
2. Facts adumbrated are as follows:-
The petitioner is the complainant and respondent No.1 is accused No.2. The 1st respondent is the firm represented by its proprietor the 2nd respondent. For the sake of convenience both these respondents would be referred to as ‘respondent’ in this order. Both the petitioner and the res
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
