SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 36540

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
RADHAMANI – Appellant
Versus
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties on I.A.No.1/2021 wherein there is a delay of 1131 days in filing the second appeal. In support of the application, an affidavit is filed stating that appellant No.1 was unable to pay the Court fee to prefer an appeal in time due to financial crises and also she was suffering from ill-health and she was not having income after the death of her husband. When she contacted her counsel, he informed that she has to file an appeal but she was struggling for arranging funds to prefer an appeal and in the meanwhile, due to COVID-19, she was unable to meet her advocate and arrange funds. Hence, there was a delay in preferring the appeal and the same has to be condoned.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents would vehemently contend that the judgment was passed in the original suit in the year 2014 and an appeal was preferred in the year 2016 and the said appeal was disposed of in the year 2016 and copy was applied in the year 2021 hence, the reason assigned in the application cannot be accepted since each day delay has not been explained by the appellants. The counsel also would vehemently contend th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top