ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN)

1. Aggrieved by the order dated 13.06.2024 passed by XI Additional District Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru, on I.A.Nos.10 to 12 in Com.O.S.No.104/2022, the defendant therein has preferred this writ petition.

2. The defendant has filed his written statement within the time stipulated, but it does not comply with the provisions of Order VI Rule 15-A of CPC as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The written statement was not verified in the manner provided and as per Order VI Rule 15A(4) of CPC, the defendant cannot rely upon such pleadings for leading evidence. It is submitted that the petitioner realized the mistake after the evidence of the plaintiff was closed and the trial court ordered that the petitioner/defendant cannot lead his evidence. Immediately, he filed I.A.No.10 under Section 151 of CPC to recall the said order of the trial court, I.A.No.11 under Section 151 of CPC with a prayer to permit the defendant to file the statement of truth in support of his written statement and I.A.No.12 under Section 5 of the Limitation Act read with Section 151 of CPC praying to condone the delay in filing I.A.No.11. The trial court has dismissed the said applications. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition is filed.

3. The case of the petitioner is that he has filed his written statement within time and that he has co-operated with the trial court at every stage without trying to drag the proceedings and it was by mistake the statement of truth was not filed along with the written statement and that it is a curable error and the trial court erred in by holding it otherwise and the petitioner will be put to irreparable loss and injury as the order of the trial court has the effect of striking off the defence of the petitioner/defendant.

4. Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondent justifies the order passed by the trial court and prays for dismissal of the writ petition. It is further contended that the provisions of Order VI Rule 15A of CPC are mandatory and having not complied with the same, then the petitioner is bound to suffer the consequences.

5. The question that arises for consideration in the instant writ petition is whether non filing of statement of truth or not complying with the mandatory provisions of Order VI Rule 15A of CPC as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, at the time of filing the written statement is a curable defect or not?

6. Order VI Rule 15A of CPC as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 reads as under:

"15A. Verification of pleadings in a Commercial Dispute.-

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in Rule 15, every pleading in a Commercial Dispute shall be verified by an affidavit in the manner and form prescribed in the Appendix to this Schedule.

(2) An affidavit under sub-rule (1) above shall be signed by the party or by one of the parties to the proceedings, or by any other person on behalf of such party or parties who is proved to the satisfaction of the Court to be acquainted with the facts of the case and who is duly authorised by such party or parties.

(3) Where a pleading is amended, the amendments must be verified in the form and manner referred to in sub-rule (1) unless the Court orders otherwise.

(4) Where a pleading is not verified in the manner provided under sub-rule (1), the party shall not be permitted to rely on such pleading as evidence or any of the matters set out therein.

(5) The Court may strike out a pleading which is not verified by a Statement of Truth, namely, the affidavit set out in the Appendix to this Schedule.”

7. A reading of the said provision makes it clear that the intention of the legislature is that when a pleading is not verified by a statement of truth as specified, the party cannot be permitted to rely on such pleading. Hence, filing of statement of truth along with the pleadings is mandatory. However, the aspect that requires to be considered is, if the same is inadvertently