SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 43216

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
P. RAKESHA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


ORDER

The petitioner-accused is before this Court seeking grant of bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in Crime No.110/2023 of Badavanahalli Police Station, pending in C.C.No.10/2024 on the file of the learned Prl. Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) & CJM Court, Madhugiri, Tumakuru District registered for the offences punishable under Sections 394, 397, 201 of Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') on the basis of the first information lodged by the informant - Sri.

Renukaradya.

2. Heard Sri. Ravi Kumar B.R., learned counsels for the petitioner and Sri. M.R.Patil, learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent-State. Perused the materials on record.

3. In view of the rival contentions urged by the learned counsel for both the parties, the point that would arise for my consideration is:

“Whether the petitioner is entitled for grant of bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.?”

My answer to the above point is in ‘Negative for the following:

R E A S O N S

4. The petitioner is arrayed as accused No.1. Serious allegations are made against him for having committed the offences as stated supra. It is this petitioner who assaulted C.W.1 with a machete on his right shoulder and snatched cash and mobile handset. Admitt

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top