SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 43444

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SMT LAKSHMAMMA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND)

Heard learned advocate Sri. H.C. Kumaraswamy for the appellant, learned Additional Government Advocate Smt. Niloufer Akbar for respondent Nos.1 to 4.

2. This appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 impugning the order of learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.24900 of 2022 dated 29.08.2023.

3. The lands bearing Sy.No.91/1 measuring 2 acres 26 guntas, Sy.No.92/2 measuring 2 acres 30 guntas and Sy.No.93 measuring 4 acre 37 guntas were originally granted in favour of Thimmaiah S/o Venkataiah and Venkataiah S/o Venkataiah under Depressed Class Rules. The said granted lands were sold by the original grantee in favour of Mavanallaiah, Gangaiah S/o Chikkarangaiah and Gangaiah S/o Byataiah, in violation of the grant order. The son of original grantee filed an application under Section 5 of the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 [hereinafter referred to as ‘PTCL Act’ for short] before respondent No.3. Respondent No.3 by order dated 31.08.1981 restored the lands in favour of the original grantee. The order of restoration was confirmed by respondent No.2-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top