SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 43441

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF AUQAF – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL COMMISSIONER – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

The primary contention in these petitions is that the respondent No.1 - Regional Commissioner, who is the Electoral Registration Officer to conduct election to the Karnataka State Wakf Board, has prepared a voters list contrary to para-2 of Form 20 as stipulated under Rule 20 of the Karnataka Waqf Rules, 2017.

2. The petitioners in WP No.26367/2024 filed objections to the draft voters list. The respondent No.1 by order dated 29.8.2024 directed the Chief Executive Officer of the Karnataka State Wakf Board to revise the final voters list by invoking conditions at Sl.Nos.2 to 5, which runs contrary to para-2 of Form 20. Form 20 under Rule 12(1) of the Karnataka Waqf Rules, 2017 reads thus:

"FORM 20 [See Rule 12(1)]

Registration of Elector of ----------------Electoral College Claim for inclusion of name in the Electoral Roll for Electoral College of ----------- for election to Member/s of Karnataka State Board of Auqaf.

To The Electoral Registration Officer to KSBA.

-------------------------

Sir, I request that my name be registered in the Electoral College of -----------

------ for election to member/s of Karnataka State Board of Auqaf.

The particulars are:

Name (in full) -----------

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top