SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 43279

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
C MALLANNA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


ORDER

The following directions which came to be issued by learned Single Judge in the order dated 18.04.2023 while disposing of Writ Petition No.153 of 2017, are brought under the contempt jurisdiction for their non-compliance, (i) The petition is partly allowed, in view of respondent No.4 having expressed helplessness to allot a site measuring 30 x 35 feet as enquired on 11.04.2023 the alternate relief is granted.

(ii) The respondents are directed to acquire the land of the petitioner measuring 10,000 square feet in terms of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and make payment of compensation within a period of two months thereafter.

2. Today, when the present contempt proceedings came up for consideration, learned Additional Government Advocate Smt.Pramodhini Kishan stated that as far as the directions issued by learned Single Judge, the acquisition proceedings have already been initiated and the proposal has been made. In this regard, she produced a copy of the proposal cum communication dated 22.05.2024 by the office of the Cit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top