Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MR JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR, MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI, JJ
RAMALINGAIAH S/O LATE MALLAPPA – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY KODIGENAHALLI POLICE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the criminal appeals and convictions. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. details of the deceased's disappearance and discovery. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 10) |
| 3. arguments presented by the defense regarding the trial. (Para 16 , 17 , 19) |
| 4. witness testimonies supporting the prosecution's case. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 25) |
| 5. last seen evidence and its implications. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 6. accused's failure to explain the deceased's absence. (Para 33 , 34 , 36) |
| 7. acquittal of accused no.3 due to lack of evidence. (Para 41 , 42) |
| 8. final judgment and orders of the court. (Para 43) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
2. Since these two appeals have arisen out of common judgment and order, they are clubbed together and decided by a common order.
4. Accused No.1 is the husband, accused No.2 is the mother-in-law and accused No.3 is the sister-in-law of deceased Bhagyamma. A charge sheet came to be filed against accused Nos.1 to 3, alleging that accused No.1 married Bhagyamma and after the marriage, they were residing together along with accused Nos.2 and 3 at Kalenahalli of Madhugiri Taluk, Tumkuru District. Accused persons were picking up quarrel with the deceased stating that she did not know household and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
