KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SMT. APPI – Appellant
Versus
PUTTUR TALUK THE TAHSILDAR – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed by the plaintiffs aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 27.11.2020 passed in O.S.No.95/2016 (Old O.S.No.199/2011) on the file of Additional Civil Judge and J.M.F.C, Puttur (hereinafter 'the Trial Court') which is confirmed by the judgment and order dated 06.02.2024 passed in R.A.No.1/2021 on the file of Prl. Senior Civil Judge and J.M.F.C, Puttur (hereinafter 'the First Appellate Court').
2. The above suit in O.S.No.95/2016 is filed by the plaintiffs claiming ownership in respect of lands bearing Sy.No. 6/3A4 measuring 0.20 acres, Sy. No. 8/5 measuring 0.46 acres, Sy. No. 6/3A3 measuring 0.32 acres, Sy. No. 8/2 measuring 0.58 acres, Sy. No. 6/3A6 measuring 0.90 acres and Sy. No. 8/4 measuring 0.46 acres are situated in Padnoor Village, Puttur Taluk, D.K.
2.1 The plaintiff No.1 claims to be the owner of the kadim warg land, which is item No.1 and 2 of A schedule property, plaintiff No.2 claims to be the owner of kadim warg land in the item No.3 and 4 of 'A' schedule property and plaintiff No.3 also claims to be the owner of kadim warg land in item No.5 and 6 of 'A' schedule property. It is contended that aforesaid lands are kumki privilege abutting t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.