SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 37820

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SRI. OMER FAROOK SAIT – Appellant
Versus
SMT. HUSNA BEGUM – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The defendant No.4 in O.S. No.26177/2022 on the file of the LXXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Mayo Hall, Bengaluru, (henceforth referred to as 'the Trial Court') has filed this appeal challenging an order dated 08.02.2024, by which applications (I.A. Nos.1 and 2 of 2022) filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘CPC’) were allowed and the defendant and their henchmen were temporarily restrained from interfering with the plaintiff’s possession of the suit schedule property pending final disposal of the suit in O.S. No.26177/2022.

2. The parties shall henceforth be referred to as they were arrayed before the Trial Court.

3. O.S. No.26177/2022 was filed for the following reliefs:

"i. Direct the Defendant No. 1 to 3 to execute a sale deed in favor of the plaintiff no.1 as per the registered sale agreement dated: 24/04/2019 and;

ii. Grant permanent injunction to the plaintiffs against the defendants along with their representative, legal heirs, henchmen etc, not to disturb the peaceful possession and enjoyment over the suit schedule property and;

iii. Declare the sale deed dated: 03/08/2020 as null and void

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top