SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 41563

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SUMADHURA HOMES LLP – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER – Respondent


ORDER

The petitioner, who asserts ownership to the properties bearing Khata No.7/1/117, Khata No.14/1/118, Khata No.13/1/118, Khata No.11/118 and Khata No.12/1/118 of Rachenahalli Village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk [the subject properties], is aggrieved by the second respondent's Endorsement dated 23.02.2024 [Annexure-A]. The second respondent, in issuing the impugned Endorsement, has acknowledged that the petitioner has paid the improvement expenses corresponding to each of the subject properties and that he would be entitled for the benefit of the revenue entries for the subject properties only upon paying the difference in amounts as mentioned below.

Difference Amount [in Rs.]
35,21,500/-1
4,06,400/-
4,06,400/-
3,61,200/-
3,61,200/-

2. Ms. Rupali K. Trivedi, the learned counsel

for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner has paid improvement expenses and the remaining amounts would essentially be the compounded interest and that the petitioner does not dispute the liability to pay the remaining amounts but he would 1 This amount is wrongly mentioned as Rs.54,94,330/- in the

Endorsement dated 23.02.2024 [Annexure-A].

request for some installments to p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top