SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 39831

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MISS. AQSA BHAT – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


ORDER

The petitioner has sought for issuance of writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to cancel the birth certificate at Annexure-‘A’ and issue endorsement.

2. The case of the petitioner is that the birth certificate at Annexure-‘A’ dated 19.07.2012 has been issued in respect of the petitioner and that the petitioner’s name has been wrongly mentioned in the said certificate as 'Aakanksha Bhaatt'. It is submitted that her name is actually Aqsa Bhat. It is submitted that date of birth that is mentioned in the original birth certificate is 29.03.1991 though it should have been 01.12.1996. It is submitted that necessary representation has been made to the respondents under Section 15 of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 (for short 'the Act') read with Rule 11 of the Karnataka Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1999 for correction.

3. It is further submitted that representations at Annexures-‘B’ to ‘F’ have been made. The representations made by the petitioner are self explanatory and relate to mistakes stating to have been committed relating to the spelling as well as date of birth.

4. It is also noticed that such representation has also been made to the Chief Reg

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top