SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 36444

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SRI VENKATARONAPPA – Appellant
Versus
SMT MUDDAMMA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The appellant who is the plaintiff in OS.No.74/2009 and the appellant in R.A.No.179/2012 is before this Court challenging the concurrent finding in the aforesaid proceedings, seeking for the following reliefs:

"WHEREFORE, the Appellant prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to:

(i) Call for the record of the proceedings in O.S.No.74/2009 on the ifle of the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn), Gudibande and R.A.No.179/2012 on the file of the Court of Sr.Civil Judge and JMFC, Chickballapur;

(ii) Set-aside the judgment and decree dated 19.02.2015 passed by the learned Sr.Civil Judge and JMFC, Chickballapur in R.A.No.179/2012 and the judgment and decree dated 01.10.2012 passed by the Civil Judge (JR.Dn.), Gudibande in O.S.No.74/2009;

(iii) Grant such other and further reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to pass in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity."

2. The plaintiff had filed a suit in OS.No.74/2009 against his mother/1st defendant and 2nd defendant and 3rd defendant who is stated to be the purchaser of the property from defendant No.1. In the said suit it is contended that the property had been granted in favour of the father of the plaintiff and hus

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top