KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MACHANI SETHURAM – Appellant
Versus
SMT SAROJINI SHUKLA – Respondent
ORDER
This petition is filed challenging the order dated
16.08.2016 passed on IA No.2 filed by the plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as 'the CPC') in O.S.No.27364/2012 on the file of XXVIII Addl. City Civil Judge at Mayohall, Bengaluru.
2. Heard Sri.Narasimharaju, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.D.P.Shivaprasad, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed suit for permanent injunction and other consequential reliefs in respect of suit schedule property mentioned in the plaint. After service of notice, respondent entered appearance and filed written statement. It is submitted that the defendants have denied the title of the petitioner in paragraph 10 of the written statement referring to the sale deeds dated 06.06.1987 and 14.11.1994. Hence, the plaintiff was compelled to file an application for amendment of the suit seeking additional prayer under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC. The Trial Court, without considering the application on its merit and without assigning any appropriate reasons, has rejected the application. It is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.