ORAL ORDER

The petitioner has challenged an order dated 31.12.2010 passed by respondent No.1 imposing a penalty of censure for recovery of Rs.1,24,396/- from the terminal benefits of the petitioner. The petitioner is also aggrieved by the order dated 06.08.2011 passed by respondent No.2 by which, the appeal filed by him was rejected. He is also aggrieved by the order dated 26.07.2012 passed by respondent No.3 by which the petition to review the orders passed by respondent Nos.1 and 2 was rejected.

2. The petitioner joined the services of respondent No.1 - Corporation during the year 1976 and retired from service with effect from 30.10.2010. The petitioner contends that when he received his retirement benefits, he was surprised to note that a sum of Rs.1,24,396/- was recovered from it on the ground that the petitioner had wrongly claimed reimbursement of medical bills for himself and his spouse by producing documents that were not valid. The petitioner contends that he and his wife were diagnosed with diabetes and hypertension since 01.12.2006 and he and his wife were claiming reimbursement of medical expenses incurred by them. The petitioner contended that on production of necessary