KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MRS JUSTICE M G UMA, J
SHAKILA WILLIS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. wife of the deceased (Para 3) |
| 2. opposing the petition (Para 5) |
| 3. point for consideration (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. peculiar facts and circumstances (Para 7) |
| 5. petition is allowed (Para 9) |
ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner on the office objection regarding maintainability of the petition. It is stated that the petitioner should have filed the writ petition and not the criminal petition under Section 482 of Cr.PC. Learned counsel submits that there is extreme urgency in the matter as the petitioner is seeking direction to respondent No.3 to issue permission to accompany the dead body of her husband for transportation to UK for the purpose of performing last rituals. Considering the urgency in the matter, the office objection is ignored.
2. Heard Sri Arun K.S. learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri. Rangaswamy, learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1 and Sri. H. Shanthi Bhushan, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Perused the materials on records.
3. It is the contention of the petitioner that she is the wife of the deceased David James Willis, a British citizen. He died on 02.11.2024 at Kolkata. As per Anne
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.