Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MR JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR, MR JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA, JJ
M/S CHANDAN EXPORTERS – Appellant
Versus
SRI SIDDANUR REVENNA SIDDAPPA AND CO – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's claim of loan (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. defendant's contention (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. trial court's findings (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. plaintiff's failure to prove (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. appeal dismissed (Para 22) |
CAV JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA)
This appeal is filed by the plaintiff in O.S.No.105/2008, challenging the judgment and decree dated 17.02.2016, passed by the learned II Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Davanagere (for short `trial Court’).
2. The appeals i.e., RFA.No.891/2016 and RFA.No.893/2016 are clubbed, but on perusal of the records, they are not interconnected. Except that, the plaintiff is same person in both the suits, but material facts vary. They pertain to different sale transactions, different cause of actions and different defendant. The trial Court also decided them separately. Hence, separate judgments are passed.
3. We refer to the parties as per their ranks before the trial Court.
4. It was the case of the plaintiff that himself and defendant are merchants and commission agents. Both are dealing in maize business. Plaintiff is running his business in the name and style of M/s.Chandan Exporters at APMC Y
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
