KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
JAI BHEEMA RAO AND BABU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
ORDER
The petitioners, who assert that they are either from the schedule caste/schedule tribe or any other backward community, are aggrieved by the second respondent’s order dated 22.01.2020 [Annexure-R]. The second respondent by this order has informed the petitioners that they have been identified as beneficiaries in the list submitted by M/s. Jai Bheemarao and Babu Jagajeevanram Sneha Seva Samithi, Pillahalli village, Dasanapura Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk, but the list is not furnished by the competent authority for the purposes of Ashraya Scheme.
The second respondent has also informed the petitioners that unless there is appropriate recommendation from the competent authority with necessary documents to establish that the petitioners hail from one of the communities as aforesaid, the request for allotment of sites under the Ashraya Scheme cannot be considered. Sri Yogesh V. Kotemath, the learned counsel for the petitioners, and Sri Shamanth Naik, the learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondents, are heard for final disposal of the petition.
Sri Shamanth Naik submits that there was a proposal to allot 4 acres in Sy.No.77 of Pillahalli village, Dasanapura Hobli, Ben
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.