SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 42992

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
JAI BHEEMA RAO AND BABU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


ORDER

The petitioners, who assert that they are either from the schedule caste/schedule tribe or any other backward community, are aggrieved by the second respondent’s order dated 22.01.2020 [Annexure-R]. The second respondent by this order has informed the petitioners that they have been identified as beneficiaries in the list submitted by M/s. Jai Bheemarao and Babu Jagajeevanram Sneha Seva Samithi, Pillahalli village, Dasanapura Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk, but the list is not furnished by the competent authority for the purposes of Ashraya Scheme.

The second respondent has also informed the petitioners that unless there is appropriate recommendation from the competent authority with necessary documents to establish that the petitioners hail from one of the communities as aforesaid, the request for allotment of sites under the Ashraya Scheme cannot be considered. Sri Yogesh V. Kotemath, the learned counsel for the petitioners, and Sri Shamanth Naik, the learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondents, are heard for final disposal of the petition.

Sri Shamanth Naik submits that there was a proposal to allot 4 acres in Sy.No.77 of Pillahalli village, Dasanapura Hobli, Ben

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top