SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 39967

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
R BABU – Appellant
Versus
M BABU – Respondent


ORDER

Heard learned counsel Sri Manjegowda, appearing on behalf of Sri Chandrashekara K.A., learned counsel for the revision petitioner. No representation on behalf of the respondent.

2. Present revision petition is filed by the accused challenging the order of conviction dated 26th August, 2013 passed in C.C.No.3697/2011 by the learned XIII A.C.M.M., Bengaluru, whereby the first Appellate Court confirmed the said order in Criminal Appeal No.487/2013 dated 1st October, 2014 by the learned Judge of Fast Track Court – XIV, Bengaluru for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

3. Facts in brief which are utmost necessary for disposal of the present revision petition are as under:

A complaint came to be filed under Section 200 Cr.P.C., by the respondent herein against the revision petitioner stating that he was acquainted with the revision petitioner and they were fast friends. In the friendship, the revision petitioner took a hand loan in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with a promise to repay the same within a short period and despite repeated demands, he did not repay the amount and finally issued a cheque bearing No.474700 dated 30.06.2010 in a sum of Rs.1,0

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top