ORDER

None appears for petitioner. Perusal of order sheet reveals there was no representation for petitioner even on previous dates of hearing.

[

2. Challenging order dated 16th November 2018 passed by Prl. Judge, Family Court, Tumakuru, in C.Mis. 150/16, this petition is filed.

3. Perusal of petition would indicate that petition is filed by husband. It is stated that marriage of petitioner and respondent was solemnized on 20.09.2015 at Sri Gopalaswamy Temple, Ananayakanahalli as per Hindu customs. It is stated that after marriage respondent residing with petitioner for very short period of time. Thereafter she went to her parents house. Thereafter she alleged that she was ill-treated & abused in filthy language etc., and sent to her parental house and re-conciliation through panchayath failed and petitioner had failed and neglected to maintain her, she filed C.Mis.no. 150/2016 under Section 125 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ('Cr.PC' for short) seeking maintenance at Rs.10,000/-

per month.

4. It is stated that on service of notice, petitioner appeared before Family Court and filed objections, denying allegations and entitlement for maintainance.

5. After recording evidence, wherein