SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 38174

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
STATE BY INTELLIGENCE OFFICER NCB – Appellant
Versus
SANNALA SRI DURGA RAKESH KUMAR – Respondent


ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for petitioner in both the petitions.

2. These two criminal petitions are filed challenging the enlarging the respondent/accused No.5 and accused No.3 in NCB Crime No.48/01/22/2021/BZU registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c)

R/w 22(a)(b)(c), 25, 27, 27A, 28 and 29 of NDPS Act

1985.

3. The factual matrix of the case is that 21 grams of MDMA alleged in the prosecution papers seized from the accused person, the same was sent for FSL and it is opined that it is amphetamine and caffeine. That the seizure was made on 21.10.2021 at about 18.10 hours based on the credible information and accused No.1 is proceeding along with other accused persons. On information and obtaining the permission from the superiors went along with panchas and apprehended the accused persons. On personal search, found 21 grams of MDMA, methamphetamine weighing 40 grams, methaqualone weighing 3 grams and mahazar was drawn and case was registered and investigation was completed and filed the final report. The accused persons who are the respondents herein i.e., accused Nos.3 and 5. The accused No.3 has filed bail application before the Trial Court in Spl.C.C.No.896/2022

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top