SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 37869

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SRI. BASAVARAJU – Appellant
Versus
PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

The petitioner has challenged a resolution passed by the respondent dated 30.07.2022 and the letter bearing No. UÁæ¥ÀA¥À:PÀªÀ-1/2022-23 dated 01.08.2022, addressed by the respondent. The petitioner has also sought for a direction to the respondent to appoint him as a Bill Collector by implementing the order dated 11.07.2022 passed by the Zilla Panchayath, Hassan, in Appeal No.1/2021-22.

2. The petitioner contends that he was appointed as an Attender at Maragondanahalli, Grama Panchayth, Holenarasipura Taluk. Later, in terms of a resolution dated 24.04.1997 of the said panchayath, he was appointed as a Bill Collector. The petitioner contends that from then on, he was been discharging duties without any blemish of whatsoever nature. His appointment was confirmed by respondent No.2 - Taluk Panchayath and he was appointed permanently on 25.01.2006. The petitioner contends that the respondent did not allow him to discharge his duty as a Bill Collector and was also not paying any salary from January 2013 on the ground that he had misappropriated the money collected. In that regard, he approached the Taluk Panchayath and Zilla Panchayath by filling representations. He claimed th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top